Tuesday, 18 October 2016

Our first reaction here is, of course, that this absolute jouissance is a myth, that it never effectively existed, that its status is purely differential, i.e., that it exists only as a negative point of reference with regard to which every effectively experienced jouissance falls short … Our experience of jouissance…as finite…immediately gives birth to the notion of a full, achieved, unlimited jouissance whose existence is necessarily presupposed by the subject who imputes it to another subject, his/her “subject supposed to enjoy.”

SLAVOJ ZIZEK http://ift.tt/2ehVr1e

No comments:

Post a Comment